What a JavaScript resume must show
Recruiters skim a resume in seven seconds and an applicant-tracking system reads it in zero. Both are looking for the same thing: evidence, in the words the posting uses. "Proficient in JavaScript" is not evidence. "Built a React + Express app with 40 Jest tests, deployed on Docker" is.
What gets filtered out
- "Skills: JavaScript, HTML, CSS, React, Node, Python, Java, C++, SQL, Git" — a keyword pile with no evidence
- "Responsible for developing web pages"
- A "Full-stack Developer" title with projects that mention no framework, no users, no result
- Coursework and tutorials listed as experience
What gets a call
- "JavaScript / TypeScript · React, Next.js · Node, Express · PostgreSQL · Jest, Vitest · Docker, GitHub Actions" — grouped, specific, matching the posting
- "Cut page load from 4.1 s to 1.3 s by code-splitting and moving a 2 MB dependency off the critical path"
- Three projects, each one line: what, with what, and a link that works
- The certificate, with its ID, under Certifications
- Skills: group them — Languages · Front-end · Back-end · Data · Tooling — and list only what you can be interviewed on. Every module in this handbook is a line you can defend.
- Every bullet: action verb, what you built, the tools in parentheses, and a number (users, requests/s, ms saved, % faster, tests).
- Mirror the posting: if it says "TypeScript" say TypeScript, not "typed JavaScript". The ATS matches strings.
- Projects section above Education if you have under three years of experience. Link the repo AND the deployed URL — a front-end project you can click is worth ten you cannot.
- One page. Plain formatting — no columns, tables or icons; ATS parsers mangle them.
Then check it, do not guess: paste the resume and a real posting into the ATS resume checker. It scores keyword coverage against the job, flags the formatting that breaks parsers, and shows which lines a recruiter's eye lands on.
