Rotate a Python list to the right by k positions, including k larger than the list. Slicing vs the reversal trick, with O(n) analysis.
The problem
Rotate nums to the right by k steps and return the rotated list.
k can be larger than len(nums), and the list can be empty.
Examples
Example 1
Input
rotate_right([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], 3)
Expected output
[4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3]
Example 2
Input
rotate_right([1, 2, 3], 1)
Expected output
[3, 1, 2]
+ 4 hidden tests on Submit — k == len, k > len, empty.
Edge cases to ask about
- k = 0
- k equal to length
- k larger than length
- Empty list
Hints
0/3How an interviewer scores this
0/9Your code runs in real CPython inside your browser — nothing is sent anywhere. The first run downloads the interpreter (about 6 MB, once). Your code is saved on this device as you type.
Complexity Lab
What does this cost as n grows?
Interviewers score the analysis as much as the code. Commit to an answer first — then check it, and measure your code against the optimal one at growing input sizes.
Pick both to reveal the answer.
Measure it
Runs the function on inputs of size 250 up to 16,000 and records the time and peak memory. Slow solutions stop early — a short curve is itself the answer.
From brute force to optimal
The progression an interviewer wants to hear, one step at a time.
| Approach | Time | Space | Idea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rotate one step k times | O(n·k) | O(n) | insert(0, …) shifts every element, k times over. |
| Slice and join | O(n) | O(n) | After k %= n, the last k elements move to the front. |
| bestThree reversals (in place) | O(n) | O(1) | Reverse all, reverse the first k, reverse the rest. |
Walkthrough of the optimal approach (try it yourself first)
First reduce k with k %= len(nums) — rotating a full lap changes nothing. Then the answer is the last k elements followed by the rest: nums[-k:] + nums[:-k].
Watch the k == 0 trap: nums[-0:] is the whole list. For an in-place O(1)-space answer, reverse the whole list, then reverse the first k, then the remaining n − k.
Complexity: O(n) time, O(n) space. Slicing copies each element once. The in-place three-reversal version gets space down to O(1).
Reveal the reference solution
def rotate_right(nums, k): if not nums: return [] k %= len(nums) return nums[-k:] + nums[:-k] if k else nums[:]
The brute force, for comparison
def rotate_right(nums, k): out = nums[:] for _ in range(k): if out: out.insert(0, out.pop()) # one step at a time return out
Follow-ups interviewers ask
- Do it in place with O(1) extra memory.
- Rotate left instead.
Frequently asked interview questions
Core interview concepts, complexities, and follow-ups scored by hiring teams.
What is the time complexity of Rotate a List Right by K Steps in Python?
The optimal solution runs in O(n) time and O(n) auxiliary space. Slicing copies each element once. The in-place three-reversal version gets space down to O(1).
What is the brute-force approach, and how do you optimise it?
Rotate one step k times: O(n·k) time, O(n) space. insert(0, …) shifts every element, k times over. Slice and join: O(n) time, O(n) space. After k %= n, the last k elements move to the front. Three reversals (in place): O(n) time, O(1) space. Reverse all, reverse the first k, reverse the rest.
What follow-up questions do interviewers ask about Rotate a List Right by K Steps?
Do it in place with O(1) extra memory. Rotate left instead.
